Why Python? | Linux Journal: "``More than one way to do it'' lent flavor and expressiveness at a small scale, but made it significantly harder to maintain consistent style across a wider code base. And many of the features that were later patched into Perl to address the complexity-control needs of bigger programs (objects, lexical scoping, ``use strict'', etc.) had a fragile, jerry-rigged feel about them."
Jest to jeden z głównych wad języków, zbyt duża ich elastyczność prowadzi do chaosu i trudności w utrzymaniu spójnego, jednolitego stylu pisania.
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz